the nonexistent
a curreal cereal ctory
ordinary joe
Until yesterday I never questioned societies methods. I just kept my mouth shut, stood straight in line, and did as I was told, not because I believed in the cause, but just because it was easier to follow directions than it was not to. Life was good enough, good enough not to question the leaders, not wanting any negative performance ratings, that might impact my life or hinder my productive progress.
I’ve gone through all the vetting, passed all requirements to move through the program at an average rate. Once again, not wanting any extra attention for being anything other than just an ordinary joe. Lower evaluation scores will trigger tutoring lessons, self-guided growth study, and the worst-case scenario, a one-way trip to one of the r4 programs, and I was perfectly happy being just another face in the crowd…until now.
I am not alone in this, during the courting and dating program, we are encouraged to find a compatible mate that will share the journey such as traditional marriage, although gender or ORC or AIMbot are only important details for certain life and program paths. Most programs and life paths are compatible with any partner pair ups, although some paths require specific pair ups, either benefiting the individuals and their paths or some for the safety of the society.
Potentially high-risk flagged r4 contributors are always paired with a partner with a strong positive creed for the society, an unwavering allegiance to the core values of the society, that will stand up to and combat the rigors of a defective mind, bent on tearing down the societal structure that has enabled a more balanced, educated and fair living environment, for all. And all of that for the low price of a few sacrifices along the way.
Sacrifices I had been willing to make, bargaining with my rebellious thoughts, pleading with them to just follow orders and not make life more challenging than it already is. Sacrifices, I have learned about (in theory) throughout all the training programs, I thought I could live with. One thing I learned was that theoretical obstacles are not always on the same plane of existence as practical, functional, and realistic situations in life (or whatever this is). There is no handbook on how to handle all the morally divisive choices that must be made every day. Every decision, every choice feels like catch-22. Thankfully most go on without much sway in one direction or the other, maintaining a direct course through the turbulence.
Sacrifices I can no longer stand behind, believe in, and support. Understanding that practical knowledge implementation and the emotional interconnectedness of feelings and knowledge are constant divisive agitators that an entity can encounter on the journey to become one with the society and reach the highest rank desirable. If not handled properly, this could exude an exponential amount of energy and cause undesirable effects on the being, and the society. I thought I could sacrifice my future children for this cause. It turns out that upon separation, I cannot.
